when a robber tells you they use macs for gaming

I wanted to get some mini-PC's to test out, since we pretty much run one data entry program, and then generally there might be some Outlook and Excel, nothing too taxing. I'm glad my Owner seems to just trust my choice with computers as long as they're cheap. What all do you guys do with your desktops? That being said, going from and i3 4gb ram and 500gb spiny disk to an i7 with 8gb ram and an SSD makes a world of difference to practically all aspects of PC use.Īnd the difference isn't that much to worry about for a one off purchase.

For what he'll pay, he can buy two of them and throw one away if it breaks. Add an SSD and whatever else you want and you'll have a real workstation. If you're enamored with Xeons, you can get a Dell T5500 with two 6-core hyper-threading Xeon 5670s at 3GHz, 12GB ECC RAM for about $650. An i7 will get you pretty close in most cases. Is your application bound by those? If so, you must have a Xeon. A faster CPU gives marginal improvement as do more cores - up to 4 after that, no improvement.Ī Xeon will bring you hyper-threading every time (vs only some i5s, for example), bigger 元 cache options, and support for ECC RAM.

An SSD makes it boot faster, but does nothing to improve app performance because there is practically no disk activity.

Sure, going from 2GB to 4GB RAM makes Windows run better, but going from 4 to 8 does practically nothing. So adding resources to the workstation doesn't make the app run any better. The con is that throwing a particular resource at a problem that isn't resource-bound is a waste.įor the thick-client vertical app user workstations we use, for example, they are server-bound.

When a robber tells you they use macs for gaming